Connect with us

Democracy & Governance

Imperative of a new Nigeria National Communication Policy -By Jide Ojo

Published

on

Jide Ojo
Jide Ojo

Jide Ojo

 

It was a rare honour and privilege to be part of the august gathering of communication experts from across the country that gathered on October 17 and 18, 2016 at the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies, Kuru near Jos. It was a rainbow coalition of sort. Participants were drawn from the academia, civil society organisations, political parties, regulatory agencies, the media, research institutes, professional bodies and security agencies to brainstorm on Nigeria’s National Communication Policy and Strategy.

Some 29 years ago, precisely in 1987 at the Administrative Staff College of Nigeria in Badagry, Nigeria produced her first draft National Mass Communication Policy which effectively came into operation in 1990. Efforts were made in 2004 and 2013 to revise the policy; unfortunately, this has yet to be consummated.

According to NIPSS, last week’s conference was aimed at providing a platform for stakeholders to deliberate on the need for a comprehensive National Communication Policy and Strategy for the country; carry out a diagnostic review of the NCPS; conduct a Strategic Gap Analysis of the NCPS; and also make recommendations and proffer implementation strategies. In a paper entitled, “Diagnostic Review of National Communication Policies and Strategies (1987 – date)”, ace broadcaster, lawyer, newspaper columnist and former Director General of Nigerian Television Authority, Dr.Tonnie Iredia, noted, inter alia, that Nigeria was 17 years late to have her first NCPS in 1987. Even at that, the effort was neither well-articulated nor comprehensive. It was also too “governmental” and heavily ministerial, having left out the private media. He also observed that public communication system in Nigeria was politicised, just as he submitted that the country’s communication efforts remained elitist, city-based and urban biased.

Advertisement

Not wanting to be seen as a mere arm-chair critic, Iredia made the following recommendations: citizen journalism/new media trends should be recognised; institutional actors need to be better mobilised; public media should belong to the people; systems approach should be applied to formulation/implementation of policy/strategy; and lastly, Nigeria’s communication policy document should be integrative.

In a presentation entitled, “Strategic Gap Analysis of Nigeria’s Communication Policy and Strategies (1987 – date), Dean of Faculty of Communication, Bayero University, Kano, Prof. Umaru Pate, observed among other things that the “Implementation of the national communication policy was not successful due to poverty, inconsistency in direction of government, emerging global realities, corruption, difficult operational climate, weakening government investments and failing public media sector, commercialisation and its consequences, skewed elite and urban centred orientation and absence of local participation”. Speaking on the last attempt to review the country’s communication policy in Calabar in 2013, the communication expert said the vision of the reviewed policy was to make Nigeria “a communicating nation”, sustain open, constant, widespread, inclusive, constructive and development-oriented communication. The objectives include enhancing quality of life of Nigerians, resolving social conflicts, and facilitating systematic, coherent and comprehensive implementation of the Millennium Development Goals and other national priorities.

Among the yawning gaps noted by Pate on the last NCPS was the fact that the review process was not broad-based as it did not address the need to integrate policy implementation at the three levels of governance namely federal, state and local government. He also noted that the extant national communication policy had a huge gap between the existence of the policy and its understanding among the stakeholders. Additionally, there is a hiatus between the spirit and letter of the policy and its implementation while very little visible efforts have been made by the government to make it work.

Advertisement

Many of the participants criticised the renaming of the country’s National Communication Policy as National Information Policy in 2013 owing to the separation of the Ministry of Communications from Information. Despite the big gap identified above by various speakers, the chair of Centre of Excellence in Multimedia and Cinematography/Radio, UNILAG 103.1 FM, Prof. Ralph Akinfeleye, in his paper entitled, “Nigeria’s National Communication Policy and Strategy: Approaches, Policy And Possible Options”, observed that “In what appeared like a fallout of the review exercise for the National Information Policy in 2013, the Federal Government in April 2015 announced the granting of broadcast licence to a total of 17 community radio stations distributed across the six geopolitical zones of the country.” Unfortunately, only three of these 17 are currently operational.

Akinfeleye reiterated the need for a consistent and clear-cut communication policy that fosters national development. The renowned communicator stressed the need to de-emphasise urban journalism and put more emphasis on rural communication, community journalism or what he tagged ‘Peoples’ Press’. He argued that since most of our media houses were city-based, the rural areas and dwellers were usually neglected or “information starved” particularly on developmental issues as encapsulated in the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.

The President of Association of Communication Scholars and Professionals of Nigeria, Prof. Lai Oso, in a paper entitled, “Challenges for Nigeria’s Comprehensive Policy and Strategy”, noted that “ICT (platforms) as tools of globalisation have no doubt weakened the capacity of nation states to control what comes in through the airwaves.” Global public sphere, he noted, was not only open but admitted just anybody, anytime from anywhere at any location. He subsequently called for the need to identify the organs through which the policy would be implemented when eventually revised.

Advertisement

There were far too many paper presenters and discussants whose views can be captured in a synthesis like this. Suffice to say that the conference ended with a Declaration. I was privileged to be part of the team of four that crafted the nine-point Declaration which includes the following: The need for one comprehensive, integrated and functional national communication policy for the country. This should reflect the constitution, national core values and align extant and relevant policies; there is a need to constitute a committee of experts to fill in the identified gaps expeditiously using scientific research in line with global best practices; the national communication policy and strategy should be locally relevant, culturally nuanced and should serve Nigeria’s national interests.

Others are that the NCPS along with a clear action plan should be reviewed every five years. The action plan should include training, research and measurement of effectiveness; the review process should include government and non-governmental stakeholders (private sector, civil society, and political parties); the NCPS should include the strategic communication needs of security and non-security Ministries, Departments and Agencies; the NIPSS should engage with all relevant MDAs required to expedite the completion of the review of the NCPS as well as the necessary action plan (possibly within six months); the outcome of the Stakeholders’ Conference should be presented to the National Council on Information meeting of October 26 – 29, 2016 in Asaba, Delta State and the National Council on Communication.

Follow me on Twitter @jideojong

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Facebook

Trending Articles