Connect with us

Democracy & Governance

The anti-corruption blow back In London -By Magnus Onyibe

Published

on

president buhari and david cameron e1463153376691

president-buhari-and-david-cameron

 

Barely 24 hours to the celebrated Anti-Corruption Summit in London, the British Prime Minister, David Cameron, and convener of the event, in a moment of indiscretion, and in the presence of the Queen of England and the Archbishop of Canterbury, verbalised his true evaluation of Nigeria, in the following damning words: “We have got some leaders of some fantastically corrupt countries coming to Britain- Nigeria and Afghanistan”, he whispers conspiratorially to his audience. He then intoned further, “possibly the two most corrupt countries in the world”.

Being in the presence of Her Majesty, the Queen and His Holiness, the Archbishop –perhaps, in obeisance to God, symbolised by the priest and country, embodied by the crown -the PM must have let down his guards and was therefore oblivious of the omnipresence of cameras.
l became outraged, at the insolence, as l believe our no-nonsense President, Muhammadu  Buhari, would have felt deeply embarrassed by such an undeserved  negative characterisation.

Advertisement

Although the affable archbishop managed to deflect a bit of the damage, by chipping in a few good words-that Buhari is not corrupt-what happened in the Buckingham Palace  smacks of the typical British duplicity-a smiling face when you are looking and sneering behind your back.

How could the British PM  lump Nigeria, which is rated no 136 together with Afghanistan rated 166-just one step ahead of Somalia, a joint last, with North Korea, on the list of Transparency International corruption index?

It is simply because of the “fantastic” amounts of money claimed to have been stolen by the previous government, that the current rulers have been bandying around to score cheap political points, but to the detriment of Nigeria and Nigerians.

Advertisement

So, what Cameron simply did,  was to interchange Somalia which is at the bottom of the list ,with Nigeria, since Nigerian officials themselves, through glib talk, have been raking up muck and in the process rating their country worse than TI’s valuation.

Take a former Delta State governor, James lbori, who has been serving a jail term in London for money laundering, for instance. At first, they said he laundered £50m, of which it is being alleged that the Department for International Development, a British government department in charge of foreign aid and grants has agreed to share the £50m when recovered, 50/50 with the Nigerian government.

Under heavier scrutiny, the whole process and charges are falling apart as British detectives and judicial officers are being found to have had their “fingers in the cookie jar”. With a policy where 40 per cent of recovered funds are retained in Britain, only a paltry portion of the funds recovered in Britain from former governor of Bayelsa State, Diepreye  Alamaiesiegha,  now late, was repatriated.

Advertisement

How about the funds said to have been found with former governor of Plateau State, now Senator Joshua Dariye, whose trial is still ongoing in the UK? There is the allegation that there was quite a difference between what was seized and what has been declared.

While not gloating over the obviously embarrassing characterisation of Nigeria as “possibly the most corrupt country in the world”, l was going to be  tempted to say, it serves our government  right – because l have been harping on the need for authorities to tone down on corruption rhetoric to avoid situations like the one that just occurred; but my patriotic instincts got a better part of me, and l became incensed by the sheer cheekiness of the comment and commentator.

Times without number, I have been  pointing out that in no distant future, such a negative label, that officials might have inadvertently been gleefully putting on Nigeria and Nigerians, would turn around to hurt the nation, at a time and place, it least expects.

Advertisement

Indeed, that moment has come and I never envisaged that the inevitable would happen so soon.
l had in my last article entitled, “Analysing the Buhari appeal” published on the eve of the London  Anti-Corruption Summit, where l mentioned that his hosts cared less about whether President Buhari was loved at home or not, but he was only invited to satisfy the selfish interests of Cameron, who is fighting to “wash off” the corruption smear that the scandalous Panama Papers conferred on him.

It may be recalled that during a debate on the infamous Panama Papers in the British parliament, a member, Dennis Skinner, was so enraged that Cameron had been benefiting from the nefarious activities that go on in such tax havens that he tagged the PM “Dodgy Dave” which is awful and warranted the suspension of Skinner, when he rejected a directive by the leader of parliament to withdraw the unsavoury slur that he put on the PM.

There are major fallout from the unfortunate Cameron Freudian slip and there are three clear lessons, reinforced by African and conventional wisdom, to be learnt from the negative image of Nigeria being dished into the public space by Nigerian politicians playing to the gallery.

Advertisement

(1) Do not wash your dirty linen in public; (2) Do not run down your country to gain international accolades; (3) and do not throw a stone into the market, it may land on your mother and hurt her.

Whether our politicians would take the friendly admonition to heart is another kettle of fish.
If such level of cynicism is going on at the gathering of members of the highest echelons of the British society-The Queen, Prime Minister, Speaker of Parliament and Archbishop of Canterbury- you can imagine what takes place amongst the lords and  barons in those members-only-clubs in the Park Lane area of London, let alone around business districts like Bond Street.

Arising from the careless and often unsubstantiated utterances about horrendous levels of corruption by top Nigerian government officials-which are obviously exaggerated, many a business partnership and transaction might have been lost internationally.

Advertisement

I can imagine how a British  businessman would warmly shake the hands of a potential Nigerian business partner, signalling the closing of a deal. After the departure of the Nigerian, he would tell his lawyer and accountant, “Check that Nigerian guy out with a magnifying glass. Their government said they are fantastically corrupt. We can’t afford to take any chances”.

A similar gaffe to the one about Nigeria and Afghanistan also occurred in London, when the Queen was caught on video discussing an incident that occurred  during a recent visit by the Chinese premier to England. The Queen’s confidential chat with a female British police commander, which was considered a snide talk and undiplomatic, has triggered a sort of row between China and the UK, albeit on a mild level, as the Chinese government has taken exception to the apparent breach of protocol, and put out a statement affirming her position that the Chinese visit had a positive outcome.

Nigeria’s Presidency too, has quickly reacted to the negative labelling with the following statement: “It is certainly not reflective of the good work the President is doing. The eyes of the world are on what is happening here. The prime minister must be looking at an old snapshot of Nigeria”.

Advertisement

Subsequently, Buhari, himself, also responded to the diplomatic faux pax in an interview with CNN’s Christian Amanpour, where he absolved the British PM of any wrongdoing.

That brings me to a recent online conversation, where someone commented thus: “l wonder If President Obama realised during his commencement speech at Howard University on May 7, that out of 96 graduating Doctor of Pharmacy candidates, 43 of them were Nigerians and out of 27 awards given, 16 went to Nigerians.” He concluded the monologue by saying, “They will only tell how Nigerians are scammers and cheats…”
That was very profound.

Last Monday, in trying to convince Britons not to exit the European Union, in an upcoming referendum, Cameron in an address to members of the British Parliament-and by extension Britons, cajoled, exalted and massaged the ego of British voters, as he reminded them of their proud heritage of conquest from India, Australia, the Americas-USA and Canada- to Africa, without talking about the barbaric medieval days when at the saying, “off with the head” by the Queen, an offender’s head would be chopped off the body.

Advertisement

The scenario above and Cameron’s involvement in the Panama Papers imply that people from all nations of the world are not perfect and leaders of nations only put forward their best foot and not advertise their bad sides.
I can imagine how infuriated Cameron would be if, before the Anti-Corruption Summit commenced, Buhari was caught on camera discussing with the Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, in his entourage, how wily, the British were, when under the guise of military expedition in 1897 to avenge the killing of British soldiers (spies) killed in Bini Kingdom under Oba Ovaramen’s watch, attacked the historic palace and carted away precious artifacts such as the resplendent Queen Idia bronze head.

Till date, most of the stolen artifacts are still being held in the British Museum and it is believed that early European voyagers like Lander Brothers etc who claimed to have “discovered” Nigeria in the course of their voyage through the Niger River, must have informed their compatriots and allies back home about the rich cultural treasures in Bini Kingdom. That might have ignited the interest of the British and their subsequent foray into the jungle of Africa, in quest of the treasures which was the trend in the medieval days.

The Cockerel/Okuku, another precious artifact looted from Nigeria, has just been taken down from its location where it has been in Manchester University, hopefully to be returned to Nigeria.
Of course, such side-talk won’t happen because Buhari and indeed Nigerians are not treacherous or petulant enough to insult their hosts in that manner.

Advertisement

Without further ado, let me conclude by emphasising that Nigerians don’t need a rocket scientist to enlighten them that some matters are better settled in the bedroom than on the streets.
This is because, if you allow a fight with your wife in the bedroom to spill into the streets and in a fit of anger you call her a prostitute, strangers would be at liberty to tag your wife with the same ignoble toga, which would soon become regrettable.

Unfortunately, that’s exactly what happened in London to Nigeria and our President has taken it stoically.
Onyibe, a development strategist, is a former commissioner in Delta State and an alumnus of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, Massachusetts

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Facebook

Trending Articles