Connect with us

Breaking News

Biafra war soldiers not qualified for entitlement – Military

“The board wishes to state clearly that its activities are regulated by the Pension Act and the Harmonised Terms and Conditions of Service for the Armed Forces of Nigeria and that the board will not act contrary to the provisions of these statutes.”

Published

on

The Military Pensions Board has said ex-military men who fought on the side of the Nigerian government during the civil war are not entitled to receive monthly pensions.

The ex-soldiers had accused the Federal Government of not paying their entitlements since they left the military about 44 years ago.

The veterans, under the umbrella of the First Intake Able Voluntary Retired or Discharged Ten or More Years in Military Service, also said they were being excluded from pension payment by the Military Pensions Board, and efforts to get them included had been unsuccessful.

Advertisement

The National Coordinator of the group, Babawande Philips, vowed to embark on a nationwide protest on Wednesday to press home their demands.

However, speaking in an interview with our correspondent on Friday, the spokesman for the board, Flight Lieutenant Olayinka Lawal, said the retired soldiers did not serve up to the 15 years stipulated by the Pensions Act and the Harmonised Terms and Conditions of Service for the Armed Forces of Nigeria to qualify for what they were demanding.

Lawal said, “The Military Pensions Board seeks to use this medium to respond and correct the allegation by a group called First Intake Able Voluntary Retired or Discharged Ten or More Years Military Service.

Advertisement

“The group claimed that the board has failed to include them on the pension payroll since they were discharged from the Armed Forces of Nigeria 44 years ago. This is outright misinformation and should be disregarded by the public.

“The board wishes to state clearly that its activities are regulated by the Pension Act and the Harmonised Terms and Conditions of Service for the Armed Forces of Nigeria and that the board will not act contrary to the provisions of these statutes.

“For the avoidance of doubt, it is important to state that some members of this group had complained to the Military Pensions Board in the past and the board made it clear to them that they are not entitled to the payment of monthly pensions because they did not serve up to the required 15 years as stipulated by the Pension Act at the time of their retirement.

Advertisement

“Investigations carried out at the board revealed that the majority of the members of this group were retired from the AFN between June 1, 1977, and May 31, 1992. During this period, to qualify for payment of gratuity, a retiree must serve the military for a minimum period of 10 years and must serve for a period not less than 15 years to qualify for payment of monthly pensions. “

He added that one of the leaders of the group, Sergeant Kasali Busari, was awarded additional service years for participating in the war, but could still not meet the stipulated years to qualify for monthly pension payment.

Lawal stated, “A case in point is that of the leader of the group, 63NA/21654 ex-Sergeant Kasali Busari, who was recruited into the Nigerian Army on July 23, 1967, and retired on May 21, 1978, after serving for 10 years and 303 days. He was awarded an additional service period of two years and 177 days as bonus for partaking in the Nigerian Civil War.

Advertisement

“Consequently, his total service years amounted to 13 years, 215 days. This falls short of the required 15 years stipulated in the Pension Act to qualify for payment of monthly pensions at that time, but he was qualified for gratuity and was paid accordingly.

“Therefore, the MPB wishes to appreciate Punch for approaching the board for clarification on this matter.”

Advertisement

Opinion Nigeria is a practical online community where both local and international authors through their opinion pieces, address today’s topical issues. In Opinion Nigeria, we believe in the right to freedom of opinion and expression. We believe that people should be free to express their opinion without interference from anyone especially the government.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

Trending Articles

Democracy & Governance5 hours ago

Fayose’s Thank You Message To Obasanjo: Uncouth, Unthinking And UnAfrican -By Isaac Asabor

Obasanjo, for his part, responded with a pointed but dignified jab, thanking Fayose for revealing his true nature and promptly...

Nigeria map and flap Nigeria map and flap
Democracy & Governance16 hours ago

Why Nigeria Must Act Now or Face the Consequences: The Wake-Up Call of the U.S. Religious Freedom Accountability Bill 2025 -By James Ezema

And to the Nigerian people—Christians, Muslims, and traditionalists alike—this moment demands unity, not division. Petition your lawmakers, demand justice, and...

Africa Russia summit and mining Africa Russia summit and mining
Global Issues2 days ago

Africa’s Mining Industry: New Opportunities for Cooperation with Russia and China -By Kestér Kenn Klomegâh

The Chinese delegation played a significant role in the event. Participants included Sun Yongjun, First Secretary of the Embassy of...

Nyesom-Wike-FCT-minister- Nyesom-Wike-FCT-minister-
Democracy & Governance2 days ago

The Yerima Effect: How A Naval Officer’s Stillness Destroyed Wike’s Political Weapons, Collapsed His Judicial Shield, And Taught A Young Democracy To Stop Fearing Strong Men -By Prof. John Egbeazien Oshodi

The Ministry of Defence publicly defended the officer, not Wike. They stated clearly that Yerima acted within lawful authority. That...

senate president lawan withdraws appointment of festus adedayo as media aide 1 senate president lawan withdraws appointment of festus adedayo as media aide 1
Democracy & Governance2 days ago

Aso Rock and Kitoye Ajasa’s Lickspittle Press -By Festus Adedayo

To demonstrate their opprobrium for Ajasa’s leaflet, the Nigerian Pioneer newspaper, the people scoffed at it on the newsstand. To Ajasa’s contemporaries, his...