Emotional Words: The Effect of Onanuga’s ‘Dead’ Comment on Nigeria’s Aircraft Purchase Debate -By John Egbeazien Oshodi

The conversation around the need for a new presidential aircraft has led to a significant discussion between Bayo Onanuga, an adviser to President Bola Tinubu, and Peter Obi, a prominent political figure. This debate touches on critical issues such as the use of public funds and the welfare of Nigerians. It also highlights the powerful impact of words on public perception and political discourse.

The discussion surrounding the acquisition of a new presidential aircraft has ignited a significant debate between Bayo Onanuga, an aide to President Bola Tinubu, and Peter Obi, a prominent figure in Nigerian politics and a presidential contestant against Tinubu in the last election. This debate is not merely about the procurement of an aircraft but also about the broader issues of government priorities, fiscal responsibility, and the connection between political leadership and the needs of the Nigerian populace.

In response, Bayo Onanuga issued a provocative statement, questioning whether Mr. Obi wished harm upon the president by insisting on the use of an outdated plane. Onanuga’s exact words were, “Do you want Tinubu dead?” This statement, which invoked the word “dead,” evoked strong emotions and became a focal point of the discussion. Onanuga’s rhetoric was perceived by many as inflammatory and exaggerated, diverting attention from the substantive issues raised by Obi to a more sensationalist narrative.

In Nigeria, as in many African cultures, discussions about sensitive topics such as death are approached with caution and respect. The way statements are framed can greatly influence how they are perceived. Onanuga’s choice of words could elicit strong reactions because of the cultural significance and sensitivity surrounding references to death. This highlights the importance of mindful and respectful communication, particularly in political discourse where words carry substantial weight and impact.

In Nigerian culture, words are not just mere tools for communication; they hold profound meanings and implications. Talking about death, especially in a political context, can evoke deep-seated emotions and fears. Therefore, political figures and public speakers must exercise heightened awareness and sensitivity when discussing such topics.

Onanuga’s remarks, which included the word “dead,” were received with heightened emotional responses, illustrating the powerful effect language can have within cultural frameworks. His statement not only shifted the debate from a discussion on fiscal responsibility to an emotional concern for the president’s safety but also emphasized the need for culturally aware and respectful rhetoric.

From a psychological perspective, Onanuga’s statement can be understood as an attempt to elicit a strong emotional reaction from the public. By invoking fear and loyalty, he aimed to create a sense of urgency and concern for the president’s safety. Such emotional appeals are often used in political rhetoric to sway public opinion, but they can also lead to polarized and outlandish responses. The strategic use of language to manipulate emotions highlights the psychological tactics employed in political communication.

In the realm of politics, the choice of words is a powerful tool for shaping public opinion and directing the course of political debates. Onanuga’s statement effectively shifted the focus from the pragmatic issue of aircraft procurement to a more personal and emotionally charged argument about the president’s well-being. This shift illustrates how rhetoric can be used to redefine the terms of a debate and influence the public’s priorities and perceptions.

Words in politics are meticulously chosen to evoke specific responses and guide the audience’s thinking. By using emotionally charged language, Onanuga was able to redirect the conversation from a critical analysis of governmental spending to a more visceral concern for the president’s safety. This tactic, while effective in changing the immediate narrative, can have lasting implications on public trust and the overall tone of political discourse. It shows how easily public opinion can be swayed by appealing to emotions rather than reasoned debate.

The use of emotionally charged rhetoric in politics is a double-edged sword. While it can mobilize support and create a sense of urgency, it can also deepen divisions and obscure the real issues at hand. The shift from discussing the practicalities of aircraft procurement to focusing on the emotional aspect of the president’s safety demonstrates the powerful influence of language in political discourse. It underscores the need for politicians to engage in more thoughtful and respectful communication to foster a more informed and rational public debate.

It is important to consider that despite the intense rivalry and criticism directed at President Tinubu, it is unlikely that Peter Obi, or any political figure, would wish harm upon the president. The emotional investment in the political process, including feelings of having been wronged in an election, does not equate to a desire for physical harm. Political discourse, even when highly charged, typically operates within the bounds of democratic debate rather than personal malice.

As we reflect on this debate, it is essential to recognize the profound impact of words in shaping political discourse and public opinion. Words have the power to unite or divide, to enlighten or mislead. In the context of Nigerian politics, fostering a culture of respectful and thoughtful communication is crucial for meaningful and constructive discussions.

By prioritizing clarity, sensitivity, and respect in our discourse, we can better address the pressing issues facing our society and work towards a more informed and engaged citizenry. Encouraging a political environment where discussions are based on facts and constructive arguments rather than emotional manipulation will help build a more robust democratic process. Respectful dialogue can pave the way for better understanding and cooperation among different political factions, ultimately contributing to the nation’s stability and progress.

President Bola Tinubu on Tuesday departed Lagos for Pretoria. Mr. Tinubu is to attend the inauguration of re-elected South Africa’s president. In the spirit of constructive debate and respectful dialogue, let us remember the importance of our words and their impact on our society. And to our dear President Tinubu, we wish you a safe journey back, and a long and healthy life. ✌️✌️✌️

John Egbeazien Oshodi

Professor John Egbeazien Oshodi, born in Uromi, Edo State, Nigeria, is an American-based police and prison scientist, forensic psychologist, public policy psychologist, and legal psychologist. He’s a government advisor on forensic-clinical psychological services in the USA and the founder of the Dr. John Egbeazien Oshodi Foundation for Psychological Health. With a significant role in introducing forensic psychology to Nigeria through N.U.C. and Nasarawa State University, he’s also a former Secretary-General of the Nigeria Psychological Association. He’s taught at esteemed institutions like Florida Memorial University, Florida International University, Nova Southeastern University, and more, and is currently an online faculty member at Weldios University, Nexus International University, and Walden University. John.Oshodi@mail.waldenu.edu