National Issues
Fulanization, Arabization Or lslamization Of Nigeria? -By Funmilayo Adesanya–Davies
History would always be a great reference point for navigating the present throug into the future.
We are aware (from studying Arabian History) that most of these Arabic features were innovated to meet exigent necessities, which are now extinct! There are several instances.

Muslims are urged to practice tenets of their Religion of Peace, as brought by the Holy Prophet (SWA) and not manifest Arabic Culture and Traditions and set up others to be dragged into it whether in schools or entire society at large which would lead to breakdown of law and order in secular states and absence PEACE.
History would always be a great reference point for navigating the present throug into the future.
We are aware (from studying Arabian History) that most of these Arabic features were innovated to meet exigent necessities, which are now extinct! There are several instances.
It was discovered that:
a, The Turban (Lawwaanii) was to protect users from desert dust and hazy storms;
b, The Hidjab was to protect users from desert dust and hazy storms;
c, Short Trousers was to protect the trousers from dirt and reduce frequency of washing (there was no shoes and there was acute water scarcity in the desert in ancient times).
d, The Purdah was used to hide stollen Wives (i.e girls kidnapped and forced into marriage) from being seen and identified by family members
e, Jalabiah was the only available fabric design in the ancient times it was used by Male and Females Arabs. Else you put the unsworn fabric round your neck.
It is thus dissapointing that
HIJAB IN CHRISTIAN MISSION SCHOOLS in Nigeria is aimed at the following:
The stealth jihad in NIGERIA.
1. First: The Hijab
2. Second: Time for Midday Prayers
3. Third: Mosque on Christian Campus
4. Fourth: Muslim Vice Principal
5. Fifth: Rotation of Principalship
6. Sixth: Change the Name of School
7. Seventh: Stealth take over of School
SOME POINTS TO NOTE WELL IS THAT:
A. GOVERNMENT DOES NOT and CANNOT OWN CHRISTIAN MISSION SCHOOLS, JUST BECAUSE OF GRANT/AIDS
B. THERE ARE MANY PRIVATELY OWNED ORGANIZATIONS and ENTERPRISES WHICH THE GOVERNMENT GRANT-AIDED WITHOUT LAYING CLAIMS OF OWNERSHIP
*GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER OWNED INDUSTRIES THAT SHE GRANT-AIDED
in BAIL-OUT EXERCISE
*GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER LAID CLAIMS TO BANKS SHE RESCUED FROM GOING UNDER
*FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CANNOT LAY CLAIMS OF OWNERSHIP ON STATE GOVERNMENTS BECAUSE IT SENDS OUT “BAIL-OUT FUNDS” TO STATES.
*GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER OWNED HOUSES/BUILDINGS THAT SHE FUNDED FOR INDIVIDUALS OR ORGANIZATIONS
*GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER OWNED PRIVATE HOSPITALS THAT SHE GRANT-AIDED
*GOVERNMENT CANNOT OWN CHRISTIAN MISSION SCHOOLS THAT SHE GRANT-AIDED.
*GOVERNMENT CANNOT OWN FARMS SHE GAVE FERTILIZERS AND FARM IMPLEMENTS TO
*GOVERNMENT CANNOT LAY CLAIMS TO BUSINESSES OF MARKET WOMEN SHE GAVE “TRADER MONI” TO.
*GOVERNMENT CANNOT LAY CLAIMS TO TRANSPORTATION BUSINESSES IN WHICH SHE GAVE GRANTS TO Nigerian Union Of Road Transport Workers and Owners to purchase Buses and Taxis
*THROUGH N.A.L.D.A, Nigeria Agricultural Land Development Agency, THE GOVERNMENT GRANT-AIDED the NIGERIAN FARMERS TO CLEAR THE LAND FOR FARMING, WITHOUT LAYING CLAIMS TO THE FARMS
*THE NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT GRANT-AIDED THE NIGERIAN FISHERMEN with BOATS, NETS, HOOKS, OVENS, and other Incentives WITHOUT LAYING CLAIMS TO THE FISHERIES BUSINESSES OF THE INDIVIDUAL FISHERMAN
*WHY IS IT only CHRISTIAN MISSION SCHOOLS THAT THE GOVERNMENT GRANT-AIDED THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS LAYING CLAIMS ON?
If for the sake of argument, we say that GOVERNMENT OWNED THE GRANT-AIDED CHRISTIAN MISSION SCHOOLS,
1. THE GOVT. may OWN THE SCHOOL
2. BUT THE CHURCH MEMBERS BUILT AND OWN THE BUILDINGS HOUSING THE SCHOOL
3. THE CHURCH CAN TELL THE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE AWAY THE SCHOOL they claim to own, BUT LEAVE/VACATE THE BUILDINGS the CHRISTIANS PAID TITHES AND OFFERINGS TO BUILD.
4. THE GOVERNMENT CAN THEN TAKE THE SCHOOL THEY CLAIM TO OWN OUT OF CHRISTIAN MISSION PREMISES.
………………………………………….
THE YORUBA WOMAN BEFORE THE ADVENT OF CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM IN YORUBALAND:
1. The Yoruba Woman was moderately dressed, judging by European and Arabic standards
2. The Yoruba Woman COVERED HER HEAD WITH “GELE”
3. The Yoruba Woman COVERED HER NECK and BOSSOM WITH “IBORUN” (= cover for the neck).
4. Asking the Yoruba Woman to wear Hijab is saying: “Throw away the Yoruba Way of Dressing Modestly, and take on the Arab Way of Dressing Modestly.
5. The EGBE ALASALATU wear Heavy GELE and cover their Upper Part with IBORUN.
6. TURKEY which is 99.99% Muslim consider themselves Europeans and not Arabs
7. TURKEY consider HIJAB as an Arabic cultural fashion
8. TURKEY states that Wearing HIJAB is not Islamic Culture, but Arab Culture
9. TURKEY has banned the wearing of HIJAB in Public Places
10. Yet, TURKEY remains 99.9 Muslim.
11. TUNISIA is 88.9% ARABIC
12. TUNISIA is 99% MUSLIM
13. Though, Muslim, TUNISIA does not enforce the wearing of HIJAB
14. Though, Arabic, TUNISIA does not enforce the wearing of Arab’s HIJAB.
15. There are 745 Cultures in NIGERIA
16. NIGERIA is not an Arab Country
17. NIGERIA is not a Muslim Country
18. HIJAB is neither Islamic nor NIGERIAN.
19. Enforcing the use of HIJAB in Nigeria is Disrespectful to Nigeria’s cultural mode of Dressing Modestly
20. Enforcing the use of HIJAB is a Stealth Way of Arabizing NIGERIA.
PLEASE LET PEACE REIGN IN OUR STATE
LET CONTINUES TO LIVE IN HARMONY.
WE ARE NIGERIANS NOT ARABIANS.
(All sources of information duly acknowledged as copied).