Connect with us

Legal Issues

Judicial Authorities Governing The Settlement Of Properties Among Parties To A Divorce Case -By Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi & Ebekehile Love Elizabeth

The case of Eke v. Eke (1993) 1 NWLR (Pt. 268) 506 highlighted the importance of considering the contributions of the parties during the marriage in the division of properties. The Court emphasized that non-financial contributions, such as homemaking and child-rearing, should be recognized and taken into account when determining the distribution of assets.

Published

on

Matrimonial Disputes and divorce

INTRODUCTION

In Nigeria, the settlement of properties in a divorce case is governed by various laws, including the Matrimonial Causes Act (MCA), State laws on marriage and divorce, and the Nigerian Constitution. These laws provide guidelines on how matrimonial assets are to be distributed between spouses upon divorce.

When it comes to the division of properties in a divorce case, the Court’s objective is to ensure fairness and equity between the parties involved.

Advertisement

Under the MCA, the Court has the power to make orders regarding the division and distribution of properties acquired during the marriage. Section 70 of the Act empowers the Court to take into account various factors when deciding on the division of properties. These factors include:

  1. The income, earning capacity, property, and other financial resources of each party.
  2. The financial needs, obligations, and responsibilities that each party has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future.
  3. The standard of living enjoyed by the family before the breakdown of the marriage.
  4. The age of each party and the duration of the marriage.
  5. Any physical or mental disability of either of the parties.
  6. The contributions made by each party to the welfare of the family, including any contribution made by looking after the home or caring for the family.
  7. The conduct of each party, if the Court considers it relevant.

These factors allow the Court to consider the unique circumstances of each case and make a fair and equitable distribution of properties. There are several judicial authorities and case laws that have shaped the settlement of properties in divorce cases in Nigeria.

One such case is the landmark decision of Oyeniran v. Oyeniran (1976) 9 & 10 SC 31, where the Supreme Court held that the Court has the power to order the sale of property and the division of the proceeds among the parties. This case established the Court’s authority to liquidate assets if necessary to achieve a fair settlement.

Another important case is Akomolafe v. Akomolafe (1990) 3 NWLR (Pt. 137) 1, where the Court emphasized the need for a just and equitable distribution of properties. The Court further stated that the principle of equal sharing of assets should not be applied mechanically but rather with regard to the specific circumstances of each case.

Advertisement

Furthermore, the case of Eke v. Eke (1993) 1 NWLR (Pt. 268) 506 highlighted the importance of considering the contributions of the parties during the marriage in the division of properties. The Court emphasized that non-financial contributions, such as homemaking and child-rearing, should be recognized and taken into account when determining the distribution of assets.

It is my submission that Nigerian Courts have provided guidance on property settlement in divorce cases because, in Akindole v. Akindole (2012) 6 NWLR (Pt. 1299) 363, the Court of Appeal held that the Court has the power to redistribute properties acquired during the marriage, taking into account the factors mentioned in the MCA. The Court emphasized the need for fairness and stated that the aim is to ensure that both parties are adequately provided for after the divorce.

Another noteworthy case in the distribution of properties in a divorce proceeding is Okotie-Eboh v. Okotie-Eboh (1992) 4 NWLR (Pt. 234) 1, where the Supreme Court held that the primary consideration in the division of properties is the welfare and interest of the children, followed by the interest of the parties. The Court stressed that its objective is to ensure a fair distribution that caters to the needs and responsibilities of each party.

Advertisement

In Awe v. Awe (2012) LPELR-20668 (CA), The Court of Appeal emphasized that the Court should adopt a fair and equitable approach when dividing matrimonial assets, considering the circumstances of each case, including the needs and welfare of the children.

In Ukeje v. Ukeje (2014) 11 NWLR (Pt. 1418), In this landmark case, the Supreme Court held that customary law practices that discriminate against women in the distribution of property upon divorce are contrary to the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution and are therefore void.

Lastly, in Okojie v. Okojie (2000) LPELR-1493 (SC), The Supreme Court held that the Court has the power to make orders for the sale of properties acquired during the marriage and the distribution of the proceeds in a just and equitable manner.

Advertisement

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the settlement of properties among parties in a divorce case in Nigeria is a complex and significant aspect of the divorce process. It involves the fair division of assets and liabilities acquired during the marriage between the spouses. In Nigeria, the legal framework for property settlement in divorce cases is primarily governed by the Matrimonial Causes Act, which provides guidelines for the equitable distribution of assets and ensures a just resolution. However, the specific outcome of property settlement depends on various factors,such as the length of the marriage, the financial contributions of each spouse, and the existence of prenuptial agreements.

SNIPPET

Advertisement

The case of Eke v. Eke (1993) 1 NWLR (Pt. 268) 506 highlighted the importance of considering the contributions of the parties during the marriage in the division of properties. The Court emphasized that non-financial contributions, such as homemaking and child-rearing, should be recognized and taken into account when determining the distribution of assets.

Key terms: marriage, divorce, analysis of cases of divorce.

 

Advertisement

AUTHOR: Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN

Mr. Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN is the Managing Partner of O. M. Atoyebi, S.A.N & Partners (OMAPLEX Law Firm).

Mr. Atoyebi has expertise in and vast knowledge of Litigation Practice and this has seen him advise and represent his vast clientele in a myriad of high-level transactions.  He holds the honour of being the youngest lawyer in Nigeria’s history to be conferred with the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria.

Advertisement

He can be reached at atoyebi@omaplex.com.ng

CONTRIBUTOR: Ebekehile Love Elizabeth

Loveis a member of the Corporate Team at OMAPLEX Law Firm. She also holds commendable legal expertiseFamily Law.

Advertisement

She can be reached at love.ebekehile@omaplex.com.ng

Opinion Nigeria is a practical online community where both local and international authors through their opinion pieces, address today’s topical issues. In Opinion Nigeria, we believe in the right to freedom of opinion and expression. We believe that people should be free to express their opinion without interference from anyone especially the government.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

Trending Articles

Democracy & Governance7 hours ago

Fayose’s Thank You Message To Obasanjo: Uncouth, Unthinking And UnAfrican -By Isaac Asabor

Obasanjo, for his part, responded with a pointed but dignified jab, thanking Fayose for revealing his true nature and promptly...

Nigeria map and flap Nigeria map and flap
Democracy & Governance17 hours ago

Why Nigeria Must Act Now or Face the Consequences: The Wake-Up Call of the U.S. Religious Freedom Accountability Bill 2025 -By James Ezema

And to the Nigerian people—Christians, Muslims, and traditionalists alike—this moment demands unity, not division. Petition your lawmakers, demand justice, and...

Africa Russia summit and mining Africa Russia summit and mining
Global Issues2 days ago

Africa’s Mining Industry: New Opportunities for Cooperation with Russia and China -By Kestér Kenn Klomegâh

The Chinese delegation played a significant role in the event. Participants included Sun Yongjun, First Secretary of the Embassy of...

Nyesom-Wike-FCT-minister- Nyesom-Wike-FCT-minister-
Democracy & Governance2 days ago

The Yerima Effect: How A Naval Officer’s Stillness Destroyed Wike’s Political Weapons, Collapsed His Judicial Shield, And Taught A Young Democracy To Stop Fearing Strong Men -By Prof. John Egbeazien Oshodi

The Ministry of Defence publicly defended the officer, not Wike. They stated clearly that Yerima acted within lawful authority. That...

senate president lawan withdraws appointment of festus adedayo as media aide 1 senate president lawan withdraws appointment of festus adedayo as media aide 1
Democracy & Governance2 days ago

Aso Rock and Kitoye Ajasa’s Lickspittle Press -By Festus Adedayo

To demonstrate their opprobrium for Ajasa’s leaflet, the Nigerian Pioneer newspaper, the people scoffed at it on the newsstand. To Ajasa’s contemporaries, his...