Connect with us

Political Issues

Mr President, What Does Wike Have On You, That He Can Openly Challenge You And Still Tell You Not To Interfere In Rivers Politics? -By Professor. John Egbeazien Oshodi

When Wike publicly declared he could challenge anybody and that Rivers State was off limits to interference, the message hovered above the entire system like a challenge to authority itself. Every time he makes statements of this nature and no consequence follows, his confidence grows and the public perception of presidential strength weakens. What we witness here is not courage but testing behavior, repeated to see where resistance truly exists.

Published

on

Tinubu and Wike

2. A Nation Watching in Psychological Silence

Nigeria has entered a strange psychological space. People are not merely listening to political speeches; they are studying body language, tone, and authority. They watch a sitting minister, Nyesom Wike, speak with a level of confidence that does not resemble submission to higher authority. They see him warning party officials, lecturing senior political figures, and behaving as though his voice carries immunity. What shocks people most is not that a politician is bold. Nigerian politics has always had bold personalities. What shocks them is that the system around him appears afraid to respond. That silence is what disturbs the collective mind of the nation.

Silence, when it comes from the highest levels of leadership, becomes more powerful than sound. It creates psychological confusion. Citizens begin to wonder who truly holds authority, who controls the narrative, and who sets the limits. In psychological terms, silence in the face of open defiance sends the message that boundaries no longer exist. People start to believe there are private deals, personal leverage, and quiet fears operating behind official doors. That perception alone is enough to destabilize trust in governance.

Advertisement

3. When a Minister Begins to Speak Like a Landlord

In many democracies, ministers speak with caution, because they understand that they serve under a President and within institutions. Yet Wike speaks as though he owns territory. When he declares that Rivers State is a no go area, he is not just describing loyalty; he is claiming personal sovereignty. When he says leave Rivers State alone, he is not negotiating political influence; he is drawing emotional borders. When he adds anything you see, take it, he is invoking the psychology of warning, suggesting that anyone who crosses a certain invisible line will face consequences.

This is no longer political rhetoric. It is the speech pattern of someone who views himself as irreplaceable. It represents the kind of language seen among leaders who believe that institutions revolve around them rather than restrain them. The deeper danger is not what he says but what people begin to internalize: that political survival is determined not by law or governance, but by proximity to certain powerful personalities. That is the seed of authoritarian thinking.

Advertisement

4. The Birth of a Psychological Debt

The perception remains widely held that Wike played a major role in helping Bola Ahmed Tinubu secure support in Rivers State during the 2023 elections. Even if we strip the story down to its simplest form, one thing is clear: Wike believes he delivered something great. And when a political actor believes he delivered something essential, he automatically feels owed. That sense of owed loyalty becomes a silent currency.

Receiving the office of FCT Minister was interpreted by many as reinforcement of that belief. Instead of seeing his appointment as national responsibility, Wike appears to view it as validation of personal relevance. The psychology shifts from service to entitlement. He no longer behaves like someone appointed by the President; he behaves like someone who assisted the President and is therefore beyond reprimand. The moment political loyalty transforms into psychological debt, democracy becomes hostage to personal transactions.

Advertisement

5. The Art of Speaking Around Power While Challenging It

Wike rarely speaks directly against President Tinubu. Instead, he directs confrontation at party leaders and political actors around the President. This is not fear. It is strategy. By attacking others, he forces attention upward without naming his true target. He creates a psychological situation in which everyone understands who he is really speaking to, yet he maintains plausible distance.

When Wike publicly declared he could challenge anybody and that Rivers State was off limits to interference, the message hovered above the entire system like a challenge to authority itself. Every time he makes statements of this nature and no consequence follows, his confidence grows and the public perception of presidential strength weakens. What we witness here is not courage but testing behavior, repeated to see where resistance truly exists.

Advertisement

6. The Emotional Wound Created at Aso Rock

The day Governor Siminalayi Fubara stood at Aso Rock beside the President and received warm acknowledgement was psychologically significant. To many viewers, it symbolized reconciliation. To Wike, it likely symbolized loss of control. The man he once mentored now stood under the umbrella of higher power without his political permission.

In political psychology, betrayal often triggers aggressive assertion. From that moment forward, Wike’s speeches carried stronger tones of anger and dominance. What the nation has been seeing is pride attempting to reassert itself. When pride goes unchecked and connects with political authority, it begins to move from leadership behavior into control behavior, and that shift is dangerous for any democratic environment.

Advertisement

7. Turning Renewed Hope into Political Insurance

Wike frequently invokes the Renewed Hope Agenda. On the surface, it sounds patriotic. He encourages Rivers people to think beyond party labels and focus on development. But psychologically, something else is occurring. By loudly aligning himself with the President’s central narrative, he wraps himself in symbolic protection. Anyone who criticizes him can be reframed as attacking the Renewed Hope vision.

He slowly becomes interpreter, protector, and judge of who supports the agenda. Hope becomes bargaining currency. Loyalty becomes insulation. And the subtle message that floats toward Abuja is simple: remember who positioned himself as your strongest field defender. Do not question my authority in my zone. The strategy is clever, but it is unhealthy for democratic institutions.

Advertisement

8. When Gratitude Rallies Turn into Threat Platforms

During his visit to Oyigbo, Wike spoke not as a statesman but as an enforcer. He warned those who comment on Rivers affairs to stay away. He suggested that some people benefited from funds they did not work for. He implied that those who challenge him may suffer consequences similar to others in the past. He declared the state a no go area.

This style of speech is built on intimidation structure. It is designed to produce caution, hesitation, and fear. When such language comes from a federal minister, it carries even heavier impact because it is perceived as backed by federal proximity. The psychological result is chilling. Debate stops. Dialogue fades. Compliance becomes safer than reason.

Advertisement

9. The Quiet Absence of Presidential Guidance

In many political systems, senior advisers immediately correct narratives that distort order. In this case, those who would usually speak loudly have chosen silence. People who previously commented strongly on foreign elections, global leaders, and foreign controversies now hesitate when faced with domestic institutional disrespect.

That silence confuses the nation. Nigerians begin to assume that Wike must hold some form of leverage. The theory may be wrong, but perception is what shapes public belief. When advisers avoid direct confrontation with disruptive behavior, it creates the impression that politics, not principle, now governs the Presidency’s communication space.

Advertisement

10. Humor as a Psychological Release Valve

Nigerians cope through humor. When fear or frustration grows, jokes begin to appear. People laugh that perhaps those remaining quiet have suddenly become comfortable. They laugh that silence sometimes arrives with privilege. Beneath the jokes, however, lies disappointment. Humor becomes the only safe channel through which collective anxiety can speak.

11. The Sentence That Never Comes

Advertisement

The entire crisis could be defused with one clear statement from the top. A simple declaration that ministers cannot threaten officials, claim territories, or undermine respect for democratic offices would restore psychological balance. That sentence has not been spoken. Its absence has become louder than any speech.

12. When Authority Refuses to Correct, Impunity Learns Confidence

Leadership must occasionally discipline those within its circle, not out of anger but for institutional health. When a leader refuses to correct open defiance, that defiance becomes normalized. The message spreads quickly: the loudest voice wins. What follows is gradual erosion of respect for the Presidency, party order, and even national law.

Advertisement

13. The Fragile Myth of Untouchability

Wike may believe he stands beyond consequence because of his political role. History suggests otherwise. Institutions move slowly but they move. Audits open, disclosures reexamined, ethics revisited, law reawakened. Political noise fades when documentation appears. No one remains permanently beyond scrutiny, especially not those who repeatedly test the state’s authority.

14. A Call for Order Without Personal Hatred

Advertisement

This argument is not born from hostility. It is a plea for stability. Nigeria cannot afford ministers who believe they outrank discipline. The healthier solution is simple: Wike should reflect deeply and resign on his own terms, or the President must restore order by clearly defining boundaries. Democracy requires clarity, not ambiguity.

15. Therapeutic Conclusion: Leadership as Emotional Regulation

Leadership involves emotional maturity. When leaders speak impulsively, citizens absorb anxiety. When authority chooses silence in moments requiring firmness, the national psyche becomes unsettled. Healing begins when leaders act with thoughtful restraint, self awareness, and courage.

Advertisement

My final appeal is reflective rather than confrontational. Wike needs inner reflection more than applause. The President needs firm clarity more than political comfort. Nigeria needs psychological calm more than dramatic political theatre. A nation stabilizes when leaders regulate themselves.

No country is beyond healing when truth is spoken carefully and boundaries are restored.

Dr. John Egbeazien Oshodi

Advertisement

Opinion Nigeria is a practical online community where both local and international authors through their opinion pieces, address today’s topical issues. In Opinion Nigeria, we believe in the right to freedom of opinion and expression. We believe that people should be free to express their opinion without interference from anyone especially the government.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments