Re: Buhari, IGP Usman Baba under fire over New Hijab dress and $1m donation to Afghanistan

Buhari, IGP Usman Baba are under fire over New Hijab dress and $1m donation to Afghanistan

Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria, HURIWA, has reminded the Inspector General of Police, IGP Usman Alkali Baba that Hijab does not protect female officers from AK-47 bullets.

HURIWA, in a statement on Sunday, also faulted the decision of President Muhammadu Buhari to gift $1 million to Afghanistan through the Organisation of Islamic Countries, OIC.

The civil rights advocacy group lambasted Usman Baba, over the introduction of Islamic dress code for female police officers in the country.

Totally in support of HURIWA’s view, a female presidential aspirant on the platform of the PDP for the 2023 upcoming election, and Presidential candidate of Mass Action Joint Alliance (MAJA) in the 2019 election, Prof. Funmilayo Adesanya-Davies beacons the approval is uncalled for except there are ulterior motives. She is asking the Buhari AP- led government to have a re-think, reconsider their position and revert it back to status quo ante amidst societal clamour and rancour against the move. The government should give us some rays of hope, she aded.

Similarly the group said, “It was unconstitutional for President Buhari to donate $1 million of public fund without appropriation to the OIC for onward disbursement to the Islamic regime that came to power by the barrel of a gun in Afghanistan.

The rights group said Section 10 of the Nigerian Constitution makes Nigeria a secular State, wondering when President Buhari will similarly play “his illegal father Christmas role by donating to the World’s Council of Churches or to adherents of African Traditionalists.”

HURIWA said the attempt by Buhari and Usman Baba to project Nigeria to the World as an Islamic nation will backfire because millions of Nigerians who have no religious affiliation “and the other organised religious group of Christians and ATR will never accept this sinister plots which will lead to avoidable disaster,” just as the rights group asked the duo to retrace their steps before it is too late.

“President Buhari and all the pro-Islamic fanatics including those who hitherto professed loyalty to al-quaeda and taliban Islamists but are still in Buhari’s regime should consider the consequences of their actions because the rest of the population that do not share same faith won’t let themselves be enslaved and conscripted to be citizens of an Islamic State when the Nigerian Constitution rules out the practicability and legality of elevating any religion as State religion in Nigeria,” HURIWA said in a statement signed by Comrade Emmanuel Onwubiko, its National Coordinator.

“These government officials had better have a change of hearts, respect the Constitution for the sake of national security and stability because Nigerians are watching and will take appropriate steps to preserve their religious freedoms,” he added.

HURIWA said the new dress code for female officers in the police, which include the use of hijab and studded earring, would not in any way increase the efficiency of police officers nor protect them from flying AK-47 bullets fired by daring criminals and bandits in the country of late.

Recall that the IGP on March 4, 2022, unveiled the new dress code for female police officers, saying it is in line with international best practices.

However, HURIWA’s Onwubiko declared that the new dress code is illegal, unconstitutional and sectarian, noting that it is an apparent move to fulfill the Islamization agenda of President Muhammadu Buhari.

Onwubiko said, “Despite the many challenges including declining staff numbers, low morale, poor training and poor welfare confronting the Nigeria Police Force under IGP Usman Baba, it is unfortunate that he chose to prioritise religious adornment over weightier matters.

“HURIWA wonders how the new dress code is of any usefulness to the shrinking 300,000 police officers in the country whose salaries are barely paid by the government and whose dilapidated barracks are unfit for pigs let alone human beings.

“Logically speaking, to what intent and purpose is the use of hijab for female police officers chasing criminals on the streets of Lagos or combating bandits on the Abuja-Kaduna Expressway? Would the hijab deflect AK-47 bullets fired by bandits from hitting the officers? The IGP should get serious.

“The Nigeria Police has been in existence since 1945 and wearing of hijab for female police officers is illegal and unconstitutional as the religion of public officers, including members of the security agencies, should be a private matter to them.

“Section 10 of the 1999 Constitution stipulates that government and all its agencies should be neutral in religious matters while Section 42 of the same Constitution forbids discrimination in all its ramifications.

“The IGP, being a Muslim from Borno State where Boko Haram operates freely, should not use the post he currently occupies to enthrone Islam on the plurality of members of the Force comprising Muslims, Christians, Catholics, traditionalists, etc.

“The IGP should respect his oath of office and desist from fanatism and the hijab controversy that has sharply divided and inflamed states such as Osun, Kwara, amongst others. He should desist from such fanatism as demonstrated by the government-backed Hisbah Police in northern Nigeria.

“If the Muslim female officers are allowed to wear hijab, how should policemen and women who are in the Celestial Church dress up when the practice of their church is against wearing shoes at all? And how should traditionalists who are in the police force dress up, with charms and amulets round their uniforms?

“It is curious that the IGP who has woefully failed to instill discipline and professionalism amongst his operatives and footdragged in the case of alleged notorious fraud accomplice and cop Abba Kyari is the same person introducing a new dress code for female police officers.

“Had things function well enough in Nigeria, the IGP should have been prosecuted for crime against humanity committed by his operatives in Imo state as documented by Amnesty International but President Buhari who too is a bigot and who donated $1million of Nigeria’s money to Afghanistan left the bigoted IGP in office and now his most important job is to introduce hijab even when his operatives behave like robbers like unknown gunmen in South East and many places.

“This IGP is a failure and deserves to be sacked so he can very well go back to North East to become his local Imam in his local mosque.

“Usman Baba should focus on combating crime, improve citizens engagement and help guaranty safety of lives and property. The religious preferences of policemen and women should be their private matters.”

We would recall a similar matter still in court as a case for determination. Dr. Tony Nwaezeigwe had draged the federal government to court insisting, “Nigeria Is Not An Islamic Country by Virtue of the Constitution” Dr. Nwaezeigwe therefore instituted a legal battle to save the life of Nigeria in what he called: “Legal Front of Our Battle Against Islamization “.

The battle line was drawn in Asaba, the capital city of Delta state and it passes through the Federal High Court of Nigeria in the Asaba Judicial Division. On one side of the battle line are the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the Attorney General of the Federation, the President of the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the Speaker, House of Representatives of Federal Republic of Nigeria and the National Assembly as defendants. On the other side are Dr. Nwankwo Tony Nwaezeigwe and members of Nigeria Civil War & Genocide Research Network as plaintiffs.

Full text of the filed lawsuit can be read in full by clicking on this link ORIGINATING SUMMONS 001 (http://goo.gl/8Z22Zs).

QUESTIONS FOR DETERMINATION

Whether Nigeria’s continuous membership of Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is not a violation of provisions of Section 10 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).

Whether Nigeria’s membership of the Islamic Military Alliance to Fight Against Terrorism does not derogate from the provisions of Section 10 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) which proclaims Nigeria as a secular State.

Whether Nigeria’s continuous membership of Development ‘8’ otherwise called (Eight Developing Islamic Countries) is not a clear violation of the provisions of Section 10 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) Nigeria being a secular State.

Whether Nigeria’s continuous membership of Islamic Development Bank is not a clear violation of the provisions of Section 10 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) Nigeria being a secular State.

Whether Islamic bond otherwise known as SUKUK or funds from Islamic Development Bank can validly be used to fund the 2016 budget deficit by the Federal Government of Nigeria having regards to the secularity of the Nigerian State.

RELIEFS SOUGHT

If the answers to questions 1 – 5 above are answered in the affirmative, then the Plaintiff seeks the following reliefs:

An Order nullifying or declaring the cessation of Nigeria’s membership of:
Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC).
Islamic Military Alliance to Fight against Terrorism.
Development 8 or Developing Islamic Countries.
Islamic Development Bank.
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE,

An Order compelling the 1st & 2nd Defendants to forthwith withdraw Nigeria’s membership of:
Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC).
Islamic Military Alliance to Fight against Terrorism.
Development 8 or Developing Islamic Countries.
Islamic Development Bank.

An Order of injunction restraining the 1st & 2nd Defendants from entering into any agreement, treaty, character, in violation of the provision of Section 10 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).

An Order of injunction restraining the 3rd & 4th Defendants from authorizing the 1st & 2nd Defendants to issue or obtain any Islamic bond otherwise known as ‘SUKUK’ for the purpose of financing any aspect of the 2016 appropriation Act and/or budget deficit.

An Order of injunction restraining the Defendants particularly the 1st & 2nd Defendants from further enlisting Nigeria into membership of any Organization meant solely for Islamic countries or any Organization bearing any religious connotation.

In a 38-item affidavit sworn by the plaintiffs, it was made clear that the main object for seeking the reliefs stated above is to arrest and reverse the relentless “Islamization of Nigeria” which has become a fait accompli unless the plaintiffs’ prayer is answered by the court. Dr. Nwaezeigwe affirmed that “the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) which I have read, especially Section 10 thereof, prohibits Nigeria’s membership of religious organizations or adoption of a particular religion as Nigerian State religion”.

“It is germane to the conclusion of this Written Address to urge your Lordship to grant all the reliefs sought by the Plaintiff because of the following reasons:

Nigeria is not an Islamic country by virtue of the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).
Organization of Islamic Cooperation; Islamic Development Bank; Eight Developing Islamic Countries (or ‘D8’) and Islamic Military Alliance to Fight Terrorism (IMAFT) are Organizations meant for Islamic countries.
SUKUK or funds from Islamic Organizations are meant for countries that are sharia compliant and not Nigeria.

The question is, “Why are islamic products always being blinded marketed in Nigeria in face if Islamist and Jihadist harassments!” Time will tell as the country is sadly been driven to its brim of extinction. THINGS FALL APART!

Read more

https://guardian.ng/tag/dr-nwankwo-tony-nwaezeigwe/