Security Is Not Politics: Let the Truth Speak in the Bauchi EFCC Case -By Yasir Shehu Adam

In Hausa parlance, there is a popular saying: “If a bride does not mount a horse, it does not mean she was not prepared.”
This proverb teaches patience, wisdom, and the danger of rushing to conclusions.

In recent weeks, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has come under intense public criticism following the arrest, detention, and prosecution of the Bauchi State Commissioner for Finance, Hon. Dr. Yakubu Adamu, over allegations bordering on money laundering and terrorism financing.

Supporters of the Bauchi State Government, including Lawal Mu’azu Abubakar, a media aide and supporter of Governor Bala Abdulkadir Mohammed, have strongly argued that the EFCC is acting politically and unfairly targeting the governor and his officials.

On the other hand, a detailed investigative report by Premium Times, based on court documents, official memos, confessional statements, and financial records, presents disturbing allegations that cannot be brushed aside with sentiments or propaganda.

This article is not written to condemn, defend blindly, or score political points. It is written to call for truth, accountability, and maturity, because security and terrorism matters are too serious to be politicised.

Bauchi Government’s Record on Security

It is important to acknowledge facts.

Under Governor Bala Abdulkadir Mohammed, the Bauchi State Government has taken visible steps to address insecurity:

– Support for security agencies and vigilante groups in Toro, Alkaleri, Ningi, and Darazo
– Provision of patrol vehicles and motorcycles
– Personal donations of salary by the governor to vigilante groups
– Efforts to resolve farmer–herder conflicts, including compensation
– Crackdown on illegal forest activities, leading to suspension and removal of some traditional rulers
– Engagement with religious leaders, women, youths, and political actors across party lines

Even critics of the governor admit that Bauchi has not collapsed into chaos like some neighbouring states.

These facts must be stated clearly.

But Allegations from Official Institutions Cannot Be Ignored

However, patriotism does not mean silence in the face of serious allegations.

The EFCC allegations did not come from political opponents, social media bloggers, or opposition propaganda units. They came from:
– Official government records
– Statements from serving and former Bauchi State officials
– Cash delivery agents
– Banking and forex transaction trails
– Court filings accepted by a Federal High Court

According to Premium Times, millions of dollars meant for “security commitments” were allegedly paid outside the banking system, through cash deliveries in restaurants, supermarkets, and private residences.

Even more troubling is the allegation that Bello Bodejo, leader of Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore, received over $2.33 million from Bauchi State sources — some of it allegedly during periods when he was in detention.

The EFCC further alleges that the Commissioner for Finance himself received nearly $7 million in cash, without acknowledgements or official documentation.

These are not light accusations. They involve terrorism financing, one of the gravest crimes under Nigerian and international law.

Security Is Not Politics

This is where many political communicators are getting it wrong.
When allegations come from EFCC, DSS, DIA, or the courts, it is dangerous and irresponsible to dismiss them as “politics” without evidence.

Statements like the one allegedly made by Al-Mustapha Haji Sufi on Albarka Radio, claiming the case is purely political, do not help the governor, the state, or the truth.

If these allegations had come from rival parties, faceless groups, or campaign propaganda, then media defence would be justified.

But when state funds, terrorism laws, and court processes are involved, the correct response is facts, documents, and explanations, not noise.

The Question Nigerians Are Asking

The most important question remains unanswered:
👉 Why was Bello Bodejo paid?
👉 What service did he render?
👉 Which contract did he execute?
👉 Who approved the payments and under what legal framework?
👉 Why were payments made in cash, outside the banking system?
These are simple questions. They deserve clear and honest answers.

If the money was truly for security coordination, then the government should present official approvals, contracts, security briefs, and beneficiary records.

Silence or political shouting will only deepen suspicion.

Let Institutions Do Their Work

Nigeria is fighting terrorism, banditry, and organised crime. The EFCC, despite its imperfections, is a statutory institution with the legal mandate to investigate financial crimes.

Distracting investigators, attacking judges, or turning serious allegations into propaganda battles weakens democracy and endangers national security.

• Let the EFCC do its job.
• Let the courts decide.
• Let evidence speak.

If the EFCC is truthful, Allah will expose the truth.
If the EFCC is lying or acting with bad intentions, Allah will disgrace falsehood.
And if any individual is innocent, Allah will protect the innocent.

Final Word

Bauchi people deserve clarity, not confusion.
Nigeria deserves accountability, not propaganda.
Security deserves truth, not politics.

History will not remember who shouted the loudest.
It will remember who stood with facts and integrity.

This too shall pass — but only the truth will remain.

Yasir Shehu Adam (Dan Liman) Journalist and writer from Bauchi.