IPOB Challenges Legal Basis of Nnamdi Kanu Conviction

The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has called on Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, to clarify the legal foundation of his recent ruling against the group’s leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

In a statement signed by its spokesperson, Comrade Emma Powerful, IPOB said it plans to scrutinize the judgment and publicly highlight what it sees as constitutional concerns.

The group argued that no weapons or attack materials were presented in court against Kanu, and no witnesses testified to any offence under Nigerian or international law. IPOB emphasized that its position is informed by its understanding of the court proceedings and legal arguments.

IPOB reiterated that calls for self-determination are protected under internationally recognized rights, including the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the International Covenants on Civil and Political, Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. The organization maintained that advocacy for a referendum or political agitation should not be criminalized. It also noted that Kanu remained in custody during recent security challenges in the South-East, which, in its view, should factor into assessments of his involvement.

Citing Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution, IPOB highlighted that no individual can be convicted of a criminal offence unless explicitly defined in written law. The group urged Justice Omotosho to specify the legal provision relied upon in reaching the judgment and confirm whether it is still valid.

The statement added that IPOB will continue to review the ruling and raise what it considers constitutional and procedural questions, stressing the broader implications for human rights, judicial standards, and the rule of law in Nigeria.

IPOB concluded by reaffirming its commitment to peaceful advocacy and its intention to engage international bodies to pursue its objectives through lawful and diplomatic channels.

Opinion Nigeria News