The Greatest Deception In Modern Christianity (Part 7A) -By Joe Dauda

There are some specific places in the Bible where the Bible talks about itself.

1
The Bible says it was inspired by God. 2 Timothy 3:16

“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness . . . “

2
The Bible says it contains enough information to lead one to salvation through obedience to the word of God, even while giving a hint that there are some secrets not revealed in it. The message there is that we are not to bother about these unrevealed secrets but focus on what is revealed, which is sufficient to aid us in obeying God.

Deuteronomy 29:29

“The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.”

3
The Bible urges that it be studied – not just read. And there is a difference between reading and studying. To get the meat of the Bible, and rightly understand its message, study is required.

2 Timothy 2:15

“Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that neededth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

4
And then there is a curse the Bible places on anyone who attempts to remove any part of it or add anything to it.

Revelation 22:18-19

“For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.”

5
To understand a particular subject in the Bible, the Bible demands that one has to about that subject all through the Bible. What it says in Genesis (if it does) and what it says in other portions. Here (in Genesis), a little, and there (in Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Jonah, Habakkuk, Philippians, Ephesians, etc.), a little. That is the safest way to understand Bible doctrine.

Isaiah 28:9-10

9. “Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? . . . For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept: line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little.”

6
Finally, the Bible categorically states that the reason why it was written was so that men would know that Jesus Christ is the Son of God – for this is how to have eternal life.

John 20:30-31

“And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of His disciples, which are not written in this book: But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through His name.”

How important is this?

If I tell you that the reason why I came to see you was to collect that laptop you promised me, even if you entertain me with my favourite meal and top it up with pure orange juice (which I greatly enjoy) except I return with that laptop, I did not fulfil my mission. There are many weighty, important, useful, interesting, and wonderful things in the Bible. But John 20:30-31 is saying that the primary reason for the Bible is for men to understand that the true God Who made heaven and earth has a Son; and that that Son is the Jesus Christ Whose biography appears in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John; and that, by believing this truth, men would have eternal life.

Jesus Christ Himself applauded Peter for understanding this truth and declared that it was His Father that revealed it to Peter.

Matthew 16:16-17

“And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but My Father which is in heaven.”

Jesus Christ later declared that eternal life consists in knowing that His Father is the only true God and that He was sent by His Father.

John 17:3

“And this is life eternal, that they might know Thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, Whom Thou has sent.”

According to Jesus Christ, how many Gods are there?

There is only One true God.

And Who is this One true God?

Jesus Christ said it is His Father.

This, at the same time, means that, apart from this only true God, there is at least one other Being in the universe that is called God. You don’t say “this is the only true Mr. Ezekiel” if there is no other person that bears the name Ezekiel. Based on passages like Isaiah 9:6 and Hebrews 1:8, we know that the other Being that is called God is Jesus Christ, even though, based on His own words, He is not the true God for there is only one true God and that Person is the Father of Jesus Christ. The only true Mr. (add your surname) is your father. But you have a legitimate right to bear that name. You look like him; you are human — just like him. If you are his only son, everything he owns belongs to you. And you bear his name without apology and can do what he can do. With his permission, you can exercise his authority on his behalf – like run his company or hire and fire under his approval. This is the case between Jesus Christ and God, for those who do not care about majority opinion but only about what the Bible teaches. Every power Jesus has was given to Him. By God.

Matthew 28:18

“All power is given unto Me in heaven and in earth.”

Now you understand why the key doctrine of Satan (and the Antichrist) is the doctrine of the Trinity, which denies that these Two (Jesus Christ and God) have a Father-Son relationship – and why it is so popular, even among “Christians” for Satan is the ruler of this world.

1 John 2:22

“Who is a liar, but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son”

By the divine authority of the Bible, I declare and aver and state in categorical terms, that, no matter what you think you are, or what you think you know, if you deny the Father-Son relationship between Jesus Christ and God, you are an antichrist. Moreover, whether you understand it or not, the doctrine of the Trinity denies the Father-Son relationship between Jesus Christ and God, for it teaches that they are equal and that they began to exist on the same day or at the same moment, thus making it impossible for One to be the Father (or originator) of the Other.

Salvation is based on the sacrifice of God in giving His only begotten Son to die for the sins of the world. Even Adam understood this because an animal had to be killed and its skin used to cover his nakedness, and that of Eve. This gave them an object lesson in the planned sacrifice of the coming Messiah. But when that Messiah came, He described Himself as the only begotten Son of God and said God had given Him to the world.

John 3:16

“For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”

But how can you give what you do not have?

How can God give Jesus to the world if Jesus was not His to give in the first place?

No matter what they verbally confess, those who believe the doctrine of the Trinity do not really believe that Jesus Christ belonged to God as surely as Isaac belonged to Abraham. They do not believe that God was the One making the sacrifice in giving Jesus Christ to die, while Jesus Christ (on His part) was showing the same submission and obedience Isaac showed in allowing himself to be tied to the bunch of wood to be killed, without any resistance.

Deep in their hearts (and they would confess this if pushed to the wall) the God Trinitarians serve consists of Three Beings who began to exist at the same time; who are equal in authority, who are all different from one another, and who possess all the attributes of omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence. It is these Three Beings that decided that, to save man, let one of them pretend to be a son, let the other pretend to be a father, and let the third pretend to be a spirit that exists as an independent entity. In the Trinitarian mindset, even though the Bible repeatedly identifies Jesus Christ as the Son of God, the Bible does not really mean that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. In their minds, Jesus Christ has no origin because, according to them, there was no time in cosmic history when Jesus Christ did not exist.

But that is a lie.

No wonder, as shown in Part 6A of this series, the doctrine of the Trinity is the doctrine of Satan and the foundation doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church, which is the organization of the Antichrist, with its head as the representative of the Antichrist. Based on their own published writings, the RCC avers that, without the doctrine of the Trinity, it has no foundation.

The most important implication of a father versus a son relationship is the fact that one existed before the other. And Jesus Christ says eternal life depends upon this truth – the truth of understanding that there is only One true God and that it was this God that sent Jesus Christ, His only begotten Son, to the earth. To the glory of God, this issue was clear to the Seventh-day Adventists, to whom the sealed portion of the prophecies of Daniel was revealed after the great disappointment of 1844. The summary of the truth revealed to them based on the unsealing of Daniel 8:14 (which is the sealed portion of Daniel) is what is contained in the three angels’ messages stated in Revelation 14:6-11.

Recall that the understanding of the first angel’s message led to the realization that the judgment had begun and that the true seventh-day Sabbath pointing to God as creator needed to be kept. The rejection of the Trinity was part of the fulfillment of the second angel’s message. Bearing in mind the fact that the Roman Catholic Church is spiritual Babylon (see Revelation 17:5 where the RCC is clearly called MYSTERY BABYLON THE GREAT) the second angel’s message was basically saying: “Babylon is fallen! Because its central doctrine is the Satanic doctrine of the Trinity; because it has changed the Sabbath commandment of God; because it is propagating the lie that the souls of men are indestructible and using that as a basis to defraud its members to pay money for the souls of the departed to receive help and be transferred from an imaginary “purgatory” to paradise; because it teaches that, since the souls of men are indestructible, they will burn in hell fire forever and ever; etc.” That was how the second angel’s message was fulfilled – by the rejection of the false doctrines of Babylon.

With regards to the rejection of the doctrine of the Trinity, one of the most prolific scholars in the pioneer set of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, John Nevin Andrews, wrote that: “The Son of God had God for His Father and did, at some point in the eternity of the past, have a beginning of days . . .”

This is in perfect agreement with Micah 5:2, which defeats the most important lie in the doctrine of the Trinity. That lie is that Jesus Christ had no origin (no Father) because He is equal to God and began to exist the very moment God existed.

Micah 5:2

“But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall He come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; Whose goings forth have been from old, from everlasting.”

The “goings forth” above means nothing if it does not mean “originating” or “coming out of” or “emanating from”. In fact, instead of the KJV “Whose goings forth” the NIV straightly says, of Christ, in Micah 5:2: “Whose origin”.

As for the word, “everlasting” in Micah 5:2, that is what J.N. Andrews means by “the eternity of the past” for he was a writer with ability to articulate doctrines far above others and reputedly the best scholar of the SDA Church in his day.

It is either Jesus Christ has no origin or He does. The doctrine of the Trinity says He has no origin (just like God) but the Bible says anyone who denies that Jesus Christ is the Son of God (that He originated from God) is an antichrist. The Father and the Son cannot be age mates: One must have existed before the Other. So, while appearing to do Jesus Christ a favour by elevating Him to the position of God, the doctrine of the Trinity is just a lie of Satan and even Jesus Christ states that His Father is greater than Him.

John 14:28

“For my Father is greater than I.”

Unfortunately for those who hate this portion of the Bible and try to make it of none-effect (while loving and defending Satan’s doctrine of the Trinity), the Bible also said, in 1 Corinthians 15:24-28, that, deep in eternity, Jesus Christ will be subject to the Father and that God will be “all in all”. As we like to say, every ship can only have one captain and the ship captain of the Universe is God.

At the end of some years, the Seventh-day Adventists came up with a list of 27 Statements of Fundamental Beliefs, which formed the basis of their fellowship for several decades. There was nothing in the 27 Statements of Fundamental Beliefs of the SDA Church that remotely suggested a belief in the doctrine of the Trinity.

Statement Number 1

1. That there is one God, a personal, spiritual Being, the Creator of all things, omnipotent, omniscient, and eternal, infinite in wisdom, holiness, justice, goodness, truth, and mercy; unchangeable, and everywhere present by His representative, the Holy Spirit. Psalm 139: 7.

Statement Number 2

That there is one Lord Jesus Christ, and Son of the Eternal Father, the One by whom God created all things, and by whom they do consist; that He took on Him the nature of the seed of Abraham for the redemption of our fallen race; that He dwelt among men, full of grace and truth, lived our example, died our sacrifice, was raised for our justification, ascended on high to be our only Mediator in the sanctuary in heaven, where, with His own blood, He makes atonement for our sins; which atonement, so far from being made on the cross, which was but the offering of the sacrifice, is the very last portion of His work as priest, according to the example of the Levitical priesthood, which foreshadowed and prefigured the ministry of our Lord in heaven. See Leviticus 16; Hebrews 8: 4, 5; 9: 6, 7; etc.

Statement Number 3

That the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments were given by inspiration of God, contain a full revelation of His will to man, and are the only infallible rule of faith and practice.

(A full list of the 27 Statements is available on request. Please send your request throughtherepeatedsecondangelmessage@gmail.com)

Note that, in the first three of the 27 Statements, nothing was said about God being a Trinity and there was no need to have a separate statement on the Holy Spirit because the Holy Spirit is simply God’s Spirit, especially if you remember that God is a Spirit and that God is Holy. Within the Statement on God, you find that the last sentence captures the Spirit by saying God is everywhere present by His representative, the Holy Spirit. Psalm 139: 7. In other words, it is through His Spirit that God is able to be omnipresent. The best way to think about it is to imagine that, we, as humans, could project our thoughts in a meaningful way and get it to work where we were not physically present — like opening the gate of a house while you were in the office because you forgot the keys just by focusing your thoughts on that gate or commanding the gate to open. Unlike us, God, through His Spirit, is able to do things all over the universe just by willing to do so. His omnipotence works with His omnipresence and gets anything done He wants done. The point is that these things are possible through God’s Spirit, which is Holy and thus referred to as the Holy Spirit. It is that simple. Trying to make the Holy Spirit an entity separate from God is blasphemous. As shown in Part 6 of this series, Satan gets any worship directed to any so-called Holy Spirit that is an entity separate from God, the Father of Jesus Christ, and Jesus Christ. There is no third Being in the universe worthy of worship. And based on Revelation 22:1, we know there are only two thrones in the universe – that of the God and of the Lamb. So worshipping a third Being as God is worshipping Satan.

These 27 Statements were, fortunately for students of Church history, published in the very first edition of the Seventh-day Adventist Church magazine called Signs of the Times in the year 1872, which was just nine years after the church itself was incorporated in 1863. According to the prophecy of Revelation 10:11 that foretold the worldwide preaching of the messages discovered after the great disappointment, the SDAC began to spread around the world and is now in virtually every country in the world.

Apart from the erudite J.N. Andrews, there were other SDA pioneers whose statements denouncing the doctrine of the Trinity are available in history books. You have James White, Uriah Smith, Joseph Bates, and a host of others. But, according to Professor of SDA Church history, George Knight, in his seminal book, Lest We Forget:

“ . . . most of the founders of the denomination could not join the church today if they had to agree to the 28 Fundamental beliefs.”

28?

The founders only synthesized 27 Statements of Beliefs. How come there are now 28 beliefs? Where did the extra come from? More importantly, what was the reason for the change? The best source of this answer must be the Seventh-day Adventist Church, so no one is accused of unfair criticism.

All through biblical history, God has used the prophetic gift to protect His people from theological errors. It was no different with the ministry of Ellen White. . . . At the same time, almost single-handedly she led the church. . . to a Trinitarian position.” P 150, Adult Sabbath School Bible Study Guide, 1^stQuarter, 2009; Teachers Edition.

In the above quotation, you have written evidence from an official document of the Seventh-day Adventist Church that the church initially rejected the doctrine of the Trinity. And that it was through the influence of Ellen Gould White that the church returned to that doctrine.

It was not going to be easy for Satan to deceive the remnant from the outside. They know too much and know who the Antichrist is. So Satan worked from within and this work was through the ministry of Ellen Gould White. Note that there are many signs identifying false teachers in the last days. But, for the remnant church, there are two specific signs. The teacher will change their theology at some point, for the Bible accuses them of “giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils.” Secondly, those teachers (or that teacher) would command abstinence from certain kinds of foods. You find this prophetic warning in 1 Timothy 4:1-3.

After several decades of the SDAC believing the 27 Statements of Fundamental Beliefs, EGW was able to use her influence to cause a return to the doctrine of the Trinity, which had been rejected under the bright light of the second angel’s message, along with other pernicious doctrines of Babylon. It goes without saying that Ellen Gould White has proven to be the most consequential member of the SDAC in history. She gained the reputation of a prophetess and then used her influence to change a doctrine which John 17:3 proves to be a key doctrine for eternal life.

Examples Of The Powerful Influence Of Ellen Gould White In The SDA Church

In spite of what is going on in the SDA Church right now — open romance with the Roman Catholic Church, gross apostasy and practice of spiritualism, especially in institutions of higher learning, support for the LGBTQ movement, support for BLM and other leftist groups, support for the Climate Change Agenda of the Pope, and general backsliding — there are many conscientious members of the church who would not dare to leave the church. And the only reason for their curious decision to remain (in spite of Amos 3:3) is that there are some quotations from the writings of Ellen Gould White about staying in the boat – no matter what. That’s how powerful her writing and influence is. They are more powerful than Amos 3:3 in the mind of the average SDA,.

All the other pioneers rejected the doctrine of the Trinity and these same pioneers were the source of all the doctrines of the church. None of the 27 original Fundamental Statements of Beliefs came through EGW. The only doctrines specifically tied to her “prophetic ministry” are the doctrines of the Trinity (which is the doctrine of the Antichrist) and also the doctrine stated in 1 Timothy 4:1-3 and which serves as an identifying mark of those who have departed from the faith and given heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils/demons. In spite of this, although she defers from all the pioneers on the doctrine of the Trinity, it is her position that is sustained in the church today and believed by a super majority of SDAs. Quite sadly, some SDAs have muddled things up to the extent that, even while rejecting the Trinity, they now teach that Jesus Christ is the Holy Spirit. They are known as the Father-Son movement and their doctrine is patently worse and more toxic than the already toxic doctrine of the Trinity. There is sufficient evidence to prove that their error is based on correctly rejecting the doctrine of the Trinity but trying to still hold on to the teachings of Ellen Gould White.

In spite of Bible teachings and the prophecy of 1 Timothy 4:1-3, SDAs still obey EGW’s command to abstain from meats (flesh foods) with no fear that she could be the subject of the prophecy that specifically mentions such a command as an identifying mark of those who may have started well but who have come under the influence of seducing spirits. Just to be sure, there is nothing wrong with the practice of vegetarianism. But, no matter how many times you read the Bible, the only laws you will find about food is the distinction between clean and unclean animals, birds, and fish. We are supposed to use our senses and eat wholesome food, while staying away from harmful food. There is no command in the whole of the Bible for anyone to abstain from eating certain foods, as long as that food is not forbidden in the laws of clean and unclean foods. But EGW fulfilled 1 Timothy 4:1-3 by commanding abstinence from meat, dairy products, and even cheese. Believers in Ellen Gould White must hate to be reminded that the resurrected Jesus Christ ate a piece of fish. One of the lies EGW has told SDAs about strict vegetarianism is that it is to prepare their bodies for the translation that will take place during the second coming of Jesus Christ, when they will be imparted with immortal bodies. But Jesus Christ resurrected with that immortal body. And it was while having that immortal body that He ate a piece of fish. How about 1 Kings 17:1-6? Is it possible to believe this and also believe that Ellen Gould White was a true prophetess? Note that Elijah is a type (example) of the last day saints who will be translated to heaven without tasting of death.

Furthermore, SDAs, because of the writings of EGW, disbelieve the very categorical words of Jesus Christ that no one would know the day nor the hour of His second coming. According to EGW, shortly before Jesus Christ returns, God will announce the specific day and hour of the second coming. Now why would God do that? And where, in the Bible, do we get such teaching? But because EGW said it, there are many SDAs that heartily believe it.

EGW taught that there are other worlds apart from ours. And it was all in a bid to deny the fact that fallen angels had intercourse with women in the time of Noah. To sustain this doctrine, she went on to teach that the “sons of God” mentioned in Genesis 6 were the sons of Seth. How then did they become giants? And where did the Bible teach that the “sons of God” mentioned in Genesis chapter 6 were the descendants of Seth?

EGW invented this theory apparently to exonerate fallen angels of the sin of having intercourse with human females. The problem is that the Bible does refer to angels as sons of God. Even when Satan appeared before God to seek permission to tempt Job, the meeting was said to have been between God and the sons of God, meaning that angels – even fallen angels – are referred to as “sons of God”. In Genesis Chapter 6, it is these fallen angels (described as sons of God) that were accused of having intercourse with women and producing giants. But Ellen Gould White says the “sons of God” was a reference to the descendants of Seth. As a human being, of course she has the right to invent any theory she feels like inventing; but the wonder of it all is that there are very serious-minded SDAs who believe these things, even though they  have access to Bibles and are intelligent enough to read.

According to EGW, the “sons of God” that came with Satan for the meeting recounted in Job chapters 1 and 2 were representatives of other worlds – just like the earth – who were there to represent the respective worlds they came from. Where, in the Bible, did we learn that, apart from this world, there are other worlds? And to make matters more interesting, even if more dangerous at the same time, EGW says that these beings came from worlds that have not fallen. In other words, the beings populating those worlds are sinless. Unlike Adam and Eve who sinned and instigated a complicated process, EGW is saying that there are worlds (definitely apart from heaven) containing beings who have never sinned. And it is these beings who came to the meeting with Satan to meet God. To further sustain her theory, EGW teaches that, in eternity, we also would be in charge of other worlds. No place in the Bible teaches that, rather than live on this earth made new, we would be in charge of other worlds. There are other doctrines credited solely to EGW which are believed by the most ardent members of the SDA Church but which are clearly unbiblical. But we would consider the risk of only this particular teaching about EGW’s claim that the “sons of God” mentioned in the Book of Job refers to beings from an unfallen world.

Although not many Christians are conscious of this prophecy, Jesus Christ prophesied the coming of a counterfeit Christ (certainly the Antichrist) who will be detected by the saints through the knowledge given to them in Matthew 24:26 about the actual manner of the second coming of Jesus Christ. This fake Christ will be an extraterrestrial being. By teaching SDAs that there are perfect beings ruling over other worlds, EGW has opened the door for SDAs to be deceived when demons posing as the spirit of dead persons begin to appear with “new light” from the Bible in order to prepare the world for the grand appearance of the Antichrist. That is how dangerous this her unbiblical teaching is. And it is based on the parable of Jesus Christ about the shepherd that leaves 99 sheep in search of a single sheep that was lost. According to EGW, there are symbolically 100 worlds in the universe. The earth was the single sheep that was lost out of this 100 and Jesus Christ left the 99 perfect unfallen worlds in order to seek and save the earth, which alone was lost.

Finally, Ellen Gould White accurately predicted certain moves of Satan in these last days. When you hear them, you will surely be amazed. But was this because she was hearing from the horse’s mouth? Remember that a fallen angel posing as Samuel the prophet told Saul he was going to die the next day. While this prediction eventually proved correct, it did not mean that the angel was an holy angel.

By her own testimony, EGW had contact with angels. Angels are called ministering spirits in the Book of Hebrews. They are spirits.

And 1 John 4:1-3 says test the spirits.

The reason for the test is to avoid the doctrine of the Antichrist.

We have already shown that the doctrine of the Antichrist is the doctrine of the Trinity. In view of the fact that it was EGW, and not any other pioneer, that was powerful enough to lead the SDA Church back into the doctrine of the Trinity (which had been rejected for several decades) we know for sure that her teachings are the teaching of antichrist and that she fails the test of 1 John 4:1-3.

It is this same person that has now opened the door for this deception by fallen angels, which will prepare the ground for the impersonation of Jesus Christ by Satan.

In terms of doctrines, the most critical addition of EGW to the SDAC is her role in leading the church back to the doctrine of the Trinity. It has been revealed to me that this is the reason for the repetition of the second angel’s message. The second angel’s message was initially fulfilled by the rejection of false doctrines by the SDAC pioneers, who were being led of God back to the true religion of Jesus Christ, as practiced by the early Christians. As already shown, their 27 Statements of Fundamental Beliefs did not include any Trinity; neither did it recognize EGW as a prophetess. But these two ideas are now in the new 28 beliefs. If the SDAC had remained faithful to the 27 Statements, there wouldn’t have been any need for the repetition of the second angel’s message. The world would have been getting these 27 Fundamental Statements and Christianity will be fully restored to the same doctrines believed by the apostles, who began the journey. But due to the ministry of EGW and the fact that the modern SDAC has rejected the true God and is now worshipping Satan through the doctrine of the Trinity, there is need for a repetition of the second angel’s message, through which God will open the eyes of the last day saints to understand that the doctrine of the Trinity is an invention of Satan himself. Only after the saints have understood this matter would the third angel’s message be mature for proclamation. Note that the real fulfilment of the third angel’s message is during the mark of the beast crisis because it warns the inhabitants of the world that they would receive the last plagues and also be cast into the lake of fire if they worship the beast. The second angel’s message, initially stated in Revelation 14:8, is repeated in Revelation 18:1-3 because God, in His infinite wisdom and knowledge, knew that Satan will set up EGW and successfully use her to undo the light of the second angel’s message, which led the pioneers of the SDAC to reject the doctrine of the Trinity. After the second angel’s message is repeated (and this call to reject the doctrine of the Trinity is the repetition of the second angel’s message) then a final call for the people of God to come out takes place, bringing the work of God’s mercy to a final and eternal end. Note that those who reject the repeated second angel’s message (even if children of God) will be doomed. It is a final call and its purpose is to undo the ministry of Ellen Gould White, who was able to deceive the remnant into rejecting the only true God and worshipping Satan through the doctrine of the Trinity. And her 666 name number is part of God’s divine providence to alert last day saints.

E    L    L    E    N:   0+50+50+0+0
G   O   U    L    D:  0+0+ 5+ 50+ 500
W H I T E: 10+ 0+1+0+0

100                             +                      555                             +                                  11                            

= 666.

Note: L = 50; I = 1; D = 500; V = U = 5; W = double U = 5+5 = 10.

He who has ears to hear, let him hear.

To be continue and concluded in Part 7B.

For further inquiries, please write totherepeatedsecondangelmessage@gmail.com

That is:

The Repeated Second Angel Message At Gmail Dot Com